Tuesday, August 08, 2006

CAT.INIST.FR

CAT.INIST.FR: "itre du document / Document title
Values as predictors of environmental attitudes : Evidence for consistency across 14 countries
Auteur(s) / Author(s)
SCHULTZ P. W. ; ZELEZNY L. ;
Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)
Department of Psychology, California State University, San Marlos, CA, ETATS-UNIS
California State University, Fresno, CA, ETATS-UNIS
Résumé / Abstract
A multinational study is reported on the relationship between values and attitudes. Environmental attitudes were measured using the revised New Environmental Paradigm (NEP: Dunlap et al., 1992) and Thompson and Barton's (1994) ecocentrism-anthropocentrism scales. Other measures included gender, SES, religion, and Schwartz's (1994) universal values scale. Survey data were obtained from college students in 14 countries. A sample of 2160 participants was obtained through university contacts in each country. Results found support for the distinction between different types of environmental attitudes. Regression analyses revealed a consistent pattern of findings across countries. Scores on the NEP scale and the ecocentrism scale were predicted by universalism (positively), power (negatively), and tradition (negatively). In contrast, anthropocentric concerns were significantly related to benevolence (negatively), power (positively), tradition (positively), and security (positively). Overall, these findings support the value-basis theory of environmental attitudes.
Revue / Journal Title
Journal of environmental psychology (J. environ. psychol.) ISSN 0272-4944
Source / Source
1999, vol. 19, no3, pp. 255-265 (29 ref.)"

IngentaConnect New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ...

IngentaConnect New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ...: "New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues

Author: Schultz P.W.1

Source: Journal of Social Issues, Volume 56, Number 3, Fall 2000, pp. 391-406(16)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

* < previous article
* |
* next article >
* |
* View Table of Contents




Article access options



Abstract:

In this article, I propose that concern for environmental problems is fundamentally linked to the degree to which people view themselves as part of the natural environment. Two studies are reported that test aspects of this theory. The first study describes the structure of people's concern for environmental problems. Results from a confirmatory factor analysis showed a clear three-factor structure, which I labeled egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric. A second study examined the effects of a perspective-taking manipulation on egoistic, social-altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns. Results showed that participants instructed to take the perspective of an animal being harmed by pollution scored significantly higher in biospheric environmental concerns than participants instructed to remain objective."

IngentaConnect New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ...

IngentaConnect New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ...

Blackwell Synergy: J Social Issues, Vol 56, Issue 3, pp. 425-442: New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ec

Blackwell Synergy: J Social Issues, Vol 56, Issue 3, pp. 425-442: New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale (Abstract)

Environmental Scale

CAT.INIST.FR

Monday, August 07, 2006

Beyond Materialism: A Coevolutionary Reinterpretation of the Environmental Crisis

Beyond Materialism: A Coevolutionary Reinterpretation of the Environmental Crisis: "Beyond Materialism: A Coevolutionary Reinterpretation of the Environmental Crisis
Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Norgaard, Richard B
Abstract

Materialism, both as a vision of the good life and as a cosmological basis underlying epistemology and modern science, drives humanity's environmental crisis. The dominant thrust of the environmental movement has been simply to shift to a longer slower materialism. Understanding how materialism creates our environmental problems and limits our vision of the good life is a necessary step toward creating a different future. Understanding development as a process of coevolution between knowledge, technology, social organization, values, and nature provides an alternative cosmological and epistemological framing which both gives us perspective on materialism and suggests an alternative vision for the future. Copyright 1995 by Taylor and Francis Group"

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Wiley InterScience: Journal: Abstract

Wiley InterScience: Journal: Abstract: "Research Article
Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure
Patrick C. L. Heaven *, Sandra Bucci
Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
email: Patrick C. L. Heaven (patrick_heaven@uow.edu.au)

*Correspondence to Patrick C. L. Heaven, Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

Abstract
Although both right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) have been found to predict racial and intergroup prejudice, previous research has suggested that RWA and SDO have quite distinct psychological features. We therefore examined the Big Five personality correlates of these two measures using facet scales from the International Personality Item Pool measure. Respondents were 220 university undergraduate volunteers. Significant sex differences were noted with respect to SDO and some facet scales. A series of analyses supported the view that RWA and SDO are aligned with different personality traits, while the discussion centred on the psychological profile of authoritarians and dominators. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."

Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures -- Pratto et al. 31 (3): 369 -- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures -- Pratto et al. 31 (3): 369 -- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology: "Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures
Felicia Pratto

University of Connecticut, pratto@psych.psy.uconn.edu

James H. Liu

Victoria University of Wellington

Shana Levin

Claremont-McKenna College

Jim Sidanius

University of California, Los Angeles

Margaret Shih

Harvard University

Hagit Bachrach

San Francisco State University

Peter Hegarty

City University of New York College of Staten Island and Business Center

The authors tested three hypotheses from social dominance theory in four cultures: (a) that individual differences in social dominance orientation (SDO), or the preference for group-based inequality, can be reliably measured in societies that are group-based hegemonies; (b) that SDO correlates positively with attitudes supporting hegemonic groups and correlates negatively with attitudes supporting oppressed groups; and (c) that men are higher on SDO than women. For the most part, the results confirmed the hypotheses. SDO scales were internally reliable and were administered in English, Chinese, and Hebrew. SDO scores correlated with sexism, measured in culturally appropriate ways, in every culture, and with ethnic prejudice and other attitudes concerning the local hegemony except in China. Men were higher on SDO than women in most samples. Findings are discussed in terms of ideological and psychological facilitators of group dominance."

Wiley InterScience: Journal: Abstract

Wiley InterScience: Journal: Abstract: "Does materialism predict racism? materialism as a distinctive social attitude and a predictor of prejudice"